Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 5 years ago
#11225 new defect
improve piecewise plotting — at Version 2
Reported by: | kcrisman | Owned by: | jason, was |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-7.3 |
Component: | graphics | Keywords: | piecewise |
Cc: | wdj, jason, jondo, kcrisman, vbraun, slelievre, mkoeppe, eviatarbach, rws | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
Until we actually totally rewrite piecewise functions, we should improve some things.
For concreteness, here is one thing that should work but doesn't. I'm sure there are more - add to this list, and then whatever isn't fixed in this ticket can be moved to another ticket. I just want to make sure they're listed in one place, not ten tickets.
List:
- plotting more than one
sage: f = Piecewise([[(0,1),x^3], [(1,2),x^2]], x) sage: plot([f,x^3],(x,0,2))
- Maybe unify with
plot_step_function
, which currently is sort of its own thing? - In this example:
sage: zero_func(x)=0 sage: g = Piecewise([[(-1000,1),zero_func],[(1,1000),(x-1)^3]],x) sage: G = g.plot() sage: G.show(xmin=-5,xmax=5,ymax=100) sage: g(1) 0
- You can use oo (infinity) for endpoints, but then the plot code for Piecewise gets screwed up.
- You can try putting in zero instead of defining this new zero function, but then g(1) and g(-1) etc. won't work.
- You can try using extend_by_zero to make the zero part, but it gives the same problem.
- You can plot without xmin and xmax, but that gives the whole function.
- You can plot without ymax, but that gives the range further out than you want.
- You can try plot(g), but that turns out to uncover a very strange error that may or may not be a bug.
Change History (2)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.