#10770 closed defect (invalid)
Expectation of probability spaces is defined improperly
Reported by: | weigandt | Owned by: | weigandt |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | misc | Keywords: | Probability, Expectation |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
I'm not sure if anyone really maintains the file
sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/probability/random_variable.py
but there's a definite problem with the way expectation is defined.
sage: X=frequency_distribution([1,1,1,2,2,2]) sage: X.expectation() 0.500000000000000
Instead of weighting values by probabilities the function sums the squares of the probabilities involved. It should be an easy fix, I"ll try to put a patch up soon, if you're used to submitting patches and bored, you'll probably get to it before me.
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by
Maybe this is what you intended?
sage: P=frequency_distribution([1,1,1,2,2,2]) sage: P Discrete probability space defined by {1: 0.500000000000000, 2: 0.500000000000000} sage: X=DiscreteRandomVariable(P, {1:1, 2:2}) sage: X Discrete random variable defined by {1: 1, 2: 2} sage: X.expectation() 1.50000000000000
Maybe the confusion is that DiscreteProbabilitySpace? inherits from DiscreteRandomVariable? (and so inherits the expectation method from DiscreteRandomVariable?)? Again, I'm not a statistician, so I'm not sure what's natural.
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by
This is more clear, at least in my mind:
sage: S='AAABBB' sage: P=frequency_distribution(S) sage: P Discrete probability space defined by {'A': 0.500000000000000, 'B': 0.500000000000000} sage: X=DiscreteRandomVariable(P, {'A':1, 'B':2}) sage: X.expectation() 1.50000000000000
That says we want a probability space that calculates the frequency over the set 'AB' of the letters in the string 'AAABBB'. So we first define the probability space. Then we create a random variable by assigning the value 1 to 'A' and 2 to 'B'. Then we can ask for the expectation of the random variable, which uses the probability space and our mapping of S to real numbers to correctly calculate the expectation.
I guess the confusing thing before was that the value of 1 was the frequency of 1, not the actual number 1.
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from new to closed
Oh, oops! Sorry for being confused here. Maybe this could have better documentation, but I think there's already a ticket open for that. So I suppose this should be closed.
Thanks Jason for showing me what I was trying to do!
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-4.7 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
I think I understand it a bit differently, but I'm not an expert in statistics. For me, it's easier to understand if we use letters rather than numbers.
So the value of 'A' is 0.5.
So the probability of 'A' is also 0.5. Thus summing up the products of the values (0.5 for each of 'A' and 'B') and the probabilities of (also 0.5 for each of 'A' and 'B') gives 0.5.
I don't know if that's the natural way to do things, but I do see some of the reasoning behind the code.