Okay, after thinking about it some more, here is what would be absolutely required for positive review.
- All questions in comment:59 and comment:63 need to be answered. Not solved! Just to have some answer, even if it's "I don't know". This will help tremendously for any followup work.
- The issue with the math formatting needing the new line must be fixed.
- The variety of bullet issues should be made better.
- The unexpected indent warning
- Display math in lists
- If not already true, allow unordered lists as sublists of ordered ones (? maybe not as important as the others)
Humbly disagreeing with jhpalmieri about the absolute paths, since I documented it - but of course that would be great, what magic makes this work but not the other version? If this does in fact work, then I guess that would be good too.
The point is that we don't want to make the review process overly long here.