Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 8 years ago
#10508 closed enhancement
Update ATLAS to stable version 3.10 — at Version 53
Reported by: | vbraun | Owned by: | tbd |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.10 |
Component: | packages: standard | Keywords: | ATLAS spkg |
Cc: | dimpase, fbissey, leif, kcrisman | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Volker Braun | Reviewers: | Benjamin Jones |
Report Upstream: | Reported upstream. No feedback yet. | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | sage-5.2.beta0 | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
The new atlas release now builds netlib lapack itself, so the lapack tarball is now included in /patches
. The lapack spkg is no longer needed and will be removed.
- Updated to newest upstream source, various patches are no longer required
SAGE_ATLAS_LIB=path
now searches inpath/libatlas.so
instead ofpath/lib/libatlas.so
so it works for people with atlas in/lib64
, too.- Threading is now enabled by default
- Flush before
os.system
(#13210)
Upstream has made some attempt at changing the layout of the shared libraries, which is now different from the static libraries. The atlas spkg contains a stub autoconf/libtools project that unpacks the static libraries and repacks them into equivalent shared libraries.
By default, ATLAS will now try twice to get timings and fail immediately if throttling is enabled. If auto-tuning fails build with SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=fast
, and if that fails with SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=base
. On x86, the fast and base targets are the new ATLAS generic targets x86SSE3 and x86SSE2/x86x87.
The current spkg version is at
http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/atlas-3.10.0.spkg
Apply trac_10508_root_repo.patch to the SAGE_ROOT repository and 10508_doctest.patch to the Sage repository.
Change History (53)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by
- Cc dimpase added
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_info
Does it mean that LAPACK spkg can be removed, too?
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by
Yes, the lapack spkg can be removed.
I'm still trying to debug some issues with linbox...
comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by
- Cc fbissey added
BLAS can also be removed if we go with this. f2c which was used before we got ATLAS to provide cblas by f2c-ing the BLAS package should also be removed (I think it listed in scipy's dependency only).
comment:6 follow-up: ↓ 7 Changed 11 years ago by
on 32-bit x86 Linux (Debian squeeze) I get the following, when trying to install the spkg (applied the patches to a pristine Sage 4.6.1.alpha3):
... make -j1 libatlas.so libptf77blas.so libf77blas.so \ libptcblas.so libcblas.so liblapack.so make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/atlas-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/lib' ld -melf_i386 -shared -soname /usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/local/lib/libatlas.so -o libatlas.so \ -rpath-link /usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/local/lib \ --whole-archive libatlas.a --no-whole-archive -lc -lm make[3]: *** No rule to make target `libptf77blas.a', needed by `libptf77blas.so'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/at las-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/lib' make[2]: *** [ptshared] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/at las-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/lib' Configuration: SAGE_LOCAL: /usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/local linker_Solaris?: False PPC?: False SPKG_DIR: /usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/atlas-3.9.32 linker_GNU?: True ld: GNU system: Linux Darwin?: False machine: i686 fortran: gfortran Solaris?: False fortran_g95?: False bits: 32bit CYGWIN?: False SPARC?: False fortran_GNU?: True FreeBSD?: False 32bit?: True Linux?: True 64bit?: False Intel?: False processor:
comment:7 in reply to: ↑ 6 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to dimpase:
on 32-bit x86 Linux (Debian squeeze) I get the following, when trying to install the spkg (applied the patches to a pristine Sage 4.6.1.alpha3):
complete install.log is here: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dima/tmp/install-alt3.9.log.gz
comment:8 follow-up: ↓ 9 Changed 11 years ago by
Hi Dima,
I think the problem is
make[6]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/atlas-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/tune/sysinfo' gcc -c -DL2SIZE=4194304 -I/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/atlas-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/include -I/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/atlas-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/../src//include -I/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/atlas-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/../src//include/contrib -DAdd_ -DF77_INTEGER=int -DStringSunStyle -DATL_OS_Linux -DATL_ARCH_CoreDuo -DATL_CPUMHZ=800 -DATL_SSE3 -DATL_SSE2 -DATL_SSE1 -DATL_GAS_x8632 -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -mfpmath=387 -fPIC -m32 /usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/atlas-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/../src//tune/sysinfo/findNT.c gcc -DL2SIZE=4194304 -I/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/atlas-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/include -I/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/atlas-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/../src//include -I/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/spkg/build/atlas-3.9.32/ATLAS-build/../src//include/contrib -DAdd_ -DF77_INTEGER=int -DStringSunStyle -DATL_OS_Linux -DATL_ARCH_CoreDuo -DATL_CPUMHZ=800 -DATL_SSE3 -DATL_SSE2 -DATL_SSE1 -DATL_GAS_x8632 -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -mfpmath=387 -fPIC -m32 -o xfindNT findNT.o ATL_walltime.o -lm /usr/lib/crt1.o: In function `_start': (.text+0x18): undefined reference to `main' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[6]: *** [xfindNT] Error 1
This fails because ATL_NCPU
is not set. Do you have a single-core processor? I guess the threaded libraries are not built in that case.
comment:9 in reply to: ↑ 8 ; follow-up: ↓ 18 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to vbraun:
This fails because
ATL_NCPU
is not set. Do you have a single-core processor? I guess the threaded libraries are not built in that case.
yes, it's single-core. An old Pentium M. (Atlas 3.8 spkg does not build on it, at all)
comment:10 follow-up: ↓ 11 Changed 11 years ago by
I changed the spkg-install
to make only single-threaded shared libraries if necessary. Should work now.
For simplicity, I made spkgs for cvxopts and sage_scripts. So you need to add
http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/atlas-3.9.32.spkg http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/cvxopt-1.1.3.p0.spkg http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/sage_scripts-4.6.1.alpha3.p0.spkg
to $SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard
and then
- replace
spkg/install
with the attached version (Note thatsage_scripts
overwrites this file during installation, aargh) - replace
spkg/standard/deps
with the attached version.
I'm still having doctest errors with linbox...
comment:11 in reply to: ↑ 10 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to vbraun:
I changed the
spkg-install
to make only single-threaded shared libraries if necessary. Should work now.
It builds OK, but then testlong gives quite a bit of failures:
The following tests failed: sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/elliptic_curves.rst" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/modsym/space.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/modsym/tests.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/modsym/subspace.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/modsym/ambient.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/modform/space.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/modform/element.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/modform/ambient.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/hecke/submodule.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/abvar/abvar.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/abvar/torsion_subgroup.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/abvar/cuspidal_subgroup.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/abvar/finite_subgroup.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_integer_dense.pyx" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_integer_dense_hnf.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/finance/time_series.pyx" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padic_lseries.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_modular_symbols.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py" sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/sha_tate.py" Total time for all tests: 30045.4 seconds
I do not know how many of them are Atlas related, though. The log is here: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dima/tmp/testlong-atl3.9.log
comment:12 follow-up: ↓ 13 Changed 11 years ago by
A lot of it is probably related. Was this a build from scratch? linbox calls seem to be particularly affected, there are a lot of failures in that path: sage.matrix.matrix_integer_dense.Matrix_integer_dense._charpoly_linbox stuff going through: sage.matrix.matrix_rational_dense.Matrix_rational_dense.right_kernel is also affected and that smells like atlas at work too.
I must say we have observed a number of failures related to ATLAS-3.9.23 in sage-on-gentoo: https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues#issue/3 you have failure there too but not due to iml/ATLAS as far as I can see. https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues#issue/6 more subtle. I see you have the failure with devel/sage/sage/finance/time_series.pyx you may want to look the comment I wrote about it in the section "known test failures for Sage on Gentoo": https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/wiki/Known-test-failures note that sage-on-gentoo can use (c)blas-reference, ATLAS or gsl-cblas or some combinations - in fact amd and intel libraries could in principle be used but no one I know has tried. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/science/blas-lapack.xml
Not sure about the SIGFPE, it could come from a result rounded to 0 or the like.
comment:13 in reply to: ↑ 12 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to fbissey:
A lot of it is probably related. Was this a build from scratch?
yes, it's a build from scratch, on the same machine (old Pentium M) as already discussed above.
linbox calls seem to be particularly affected, there are a lot of failures in that path:
I wonder if these are Atlas bugs, or Linbox bugs...
One should try an OSX build.
comment:14 follow-up: ↓ 15 Changed 11 years ago by
why OS X in particular? I could do that but not before the 5th of January, when my university reopens. Ok I could do it before that but I'll enjoy the break a little bit more :)
comment:15 in reply to: ↑ 14 ; follow-up: ↓ 16 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to fbissey:
why OS X in particular? I could do that but not before the 5th of January, when my university reopens. Ok I could do it before that but I'll enjoy the break a little bit more :)
Or does OSX remain disabled for Atlas, i.e. it's not built?
comment:16 in reply to: ↑ 15 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to dimpase:
Replying to fbissey:
why OS X in particular? I could do that but not before the 5th of January, when my university reopens. Ok I could do it before that but I'll enjoy the break a little bit more :)
Or does OSX remain disabled for Atlas, i.e. it's not built?
I had forgotten about that. I checked the spkg and ATLAS is not built on cygwin and OS X. So it makes sense.
comment:17 follow-up: ↓ 20 Changed 11 years ago by
I get the same doctest errors. Most of them are linbox related. The SIGFPE is from converting a NAN into a GMP integer, but I haven't gotten to the root of the NAN yet. In trying to debug this I've noticed that there are a bunch of valgrind warnings in the linbox code path we are using. I've asked some more specific questions on the linbox-use mailinglist:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/linbox-use/N3QNNOQuTAc/discussion
But so far no final conclusion.
comment:18 in reply to: ↑ 9 ; follow-up: ↓ 19 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to dimpase:
Replying to vbraun:
This fails because
ATL_NCPU
is not set. Do you have a single-core processor? I guess the threaded libraries are not built in that case.yes, it's single-core. An old Pentium M. (Atlas 3.8 spkg does not build on it, at all)
I notice you say it is a Pentium M, yet ATLAS is compiling things with the assumption that it is a coreduo: -DATL_ARCH_CoreDuo -DATL_CPUMHZ=800 -DATL_SSE3 -DATL_SSE2 -DATL_SSE1 -DATL_GAS_x8632 I am guessing the speed is right but the rest is not. Was your successful build using these parameters? I had in one instance a non-working ATLAS because the cpu type was misdetected (wanted to use sse3 when it didn't have them). The build was curiously successful but the library was unusable.
comment:19 in reply to: ↑ 18 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to fbissey:
Replying to dimpase:
Replying to vbraun:
This fails because
ATL_NCPU
is not set. Do you have a single-core processor? I guess the threaded libraries are not built in that case.yes, it's single-core. An old Pentium M. (Atlas 3.8 spkg does not build on it, at all)
I notice you say it is a Pentium M, yet ATLAS is compiling things with the assumption that it is a coreduo: -DATL_ARCH_CoreDuo -DATL_CPUMHZ=800 -DATL_SSE3 -DATL_SSE2 -DATL_SSE1 -DATL_GAS_x8632 I am guessing the speed is right but the rest is not. Was your successful build using these parameters? I had in one instance a non-working ATLAS because the cpu type was misdetected (wanted to use sse3 when it didn't have them). The build was curiously successful but the library was unusable.
The processor is Pentium M Banias 1.1GHz, http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27600 (according to GotoBlas? installation procedure :-))
The Atlas built is not totally useless, it works for many doctests. By the way, 3.8 also thinks it's a CoreDuo?. And it works. I saw somewhere a note that it's OK.
comment:20 in reply to: ↑ 17 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to vbraun:
I get the same doctest errors. Most of them are linbox related. The SIGFPE is from converting a NAN into a GMP integer, but I haven't gotten to the root of the NAN yet. In trying to debug this I've noticed that there are a bunch of valgrind warnings in the linbox code path we are using. I've asked some more specific questions on the linbox-use mailinglist:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/linbox-use/N3QNNOQuTAc/discussion
But so far no final conclusion.
Converting a NAN into a GMP integer is exactly what was happening in https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/3 and it didn't happen when using gslcblas. I will do a full build of sage-on-gentoo with 3.9.40 (or 41) and see if I can see anything.
comment:21 Changed 10 years ago by
Yuck, still got problems leading to linbox, I got the ones leading to iml too. Note that using another cblas like gslcblas/openblas/reference(netlib) all these problems disappear which seem to indicate that there is something going on in ATLAS itself or that all the others gets it wrong (I realise that on a stock sage you may have trouble compiling iml with anything else than ATLAS, it requires some patching to the configure script to be able to do so).
comment:22 Changed 10 years ago by
It may be worth noting that new released are available for both stable and development:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/math-atlas/files/Stable/3.8.4/|Stable http://sourceforge.net/projects/math-atlas/files/Developer%20%28unstable%29/3.9.41/|Unstable
comment:23 Changed 10 years ago by
I have 3.9.41 now, the only difference was it compiled faster because there was tuning for my cpu. But we could investigate 3.8.4. Thanks for pointing it is out, some of us (me at least) didn't think it would ever happen. We may have a stable ATLAS supporting newer CPUs at last, and it looks like I could test it quickly.
comment:24 Changed 10 years ago by
OK 3.8.4 doesn't suffer from any of the drawbacks that are apparent in 3.9.23+.
The big drawback is that it doesn't build lapack nicely on its own, provided we point to the sources like the latest 3.9.xx do. That means spkg-install would need a little bit more work.
Opinions?
comment:25 Changed 10 years ago by
Can we keep this ticket focused on the development version of atlas and discuss the stable ATLAS on #10226? I updated the spkg on the latter ticket to the new stable ATLAS release.
comment:26 Changed 10 years ago by
Sure. My current opinion and that's something I am pushing to sage-on-gentoo users is to avoid ATLAS 3.9.xx for the time being. It is possible that ATLAS-3.9.xx is doing something permissible that iml and linbox are not ready to catch. My line of thought is that I remember that some algorithm in iml takes the inverse of a result returned by cblas. If the result is 0 instead of a small value we may have our NaN, more likely some result from ATLAS is a NaN.
comment:27 Changed 10 years ago by
- Cc leif added
Note that you can copy updated spkgs into spkg/standard/
and then do
env SAGE_UPGRADING=yes make build
to rebuild all dependent packages.
(We should perhaps add make
targets for that to the top-level Makefile and document them in the Developer's Guide, as this is currently just a side-effect of the effort to make upgrading work.)
If you at the same time need to apply patches to the Sage library, things get a bit more complicated, as e.g. Sage switches to the main
branch before reinstalling the Sage library package. One safe way is to first apply the patches, create a new sage-x.y.z-whatever
spkg (with devel/sage/spkg-dist
) and replace the one in spkg/standard/
with that one (or at least make sure newest_version
will pick up the right one).
Note that the extension modules' dependencies in module_list.py
are currently far from complete. #8664 adds some in a generic way by adding them automatically in setup.py
, i.e. lets modules also depend on the headers of the libraries they use (which [only] works if the headers' mtimes get modified / updated during installation of their corresponding libraries). The dumb alternative is to run sage -ba-force
after an "upgrade" process.
comment:28 follow-up: ↓ 29 Changed 10 years ago by
Ping.
comment:29 in reply to: ↑ 28 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to leif:
Ping.
just fired up my vintage MacOSX 32-bit Powerbbok PPC... Will know more in, like, 12 hours...
comment:30 follow-up: ↓ 31 Changed 10 years ago by
Several issues:
- atlas is now at version 3.9.49 (last I checked)
- I have reports of it failling to build on some old opterons
- @dimpase: do you need atlas on OS X ppc? Don't you use vectorize like the other OS X?
- I haven't checked but I am quite sure from other reports that cblas_dgem{m,v} is still buggy (someone posted that R built against that Atlas lapack was giving them trouble and R upstream pointed the finger to Atlas).
comment:31 in reply to: ↑ 30 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to fbissey:
Several issues:
- atlas is now at version 3.9.49 (last I checked)
- I have reports of it failling to build on some old opterons
so what? I have a 5-year old 32-bit Intel laptop on which the sage-current Atlas does not build.
- @dimpase: do you need atlas on OS X ppc? Don't you use vectorize like the other OS X?
indeed. But that's for #10509. Oops, was posting on the wrong ticket...
comment:32 Changed 9 years ago by
With respect to comment:33:ticket:12011, should this be closed as a dup of #12011?
comment:33 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_info to needs_review
propose to close this one and refer to #12011 the the continuation of the upgrade work.
comment:34 Changed 9 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.0 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
I would say #12011 is a duplicate of my ticket but oh well ;-)
comment:35 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Milestone changed from sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix to sage-5.0
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
- Summary changed from Update ATLAS to version 3.9.32 to Update ATLAS to version 3.9.x
Seems like #12011 isn't a duplicate after all...
comment:36 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:37 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:38 Changed 9 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.1 to sage-5.3
Obviously, the patches to spkg/install
and spkg/standard/deps
must be rebased.
comment:39 Changed 9 years ago by
It makes a lot more sense to me to put the LAPACK
tarball at the top level of the spkg instead of in patches/
.
patches/ATLAS-lib/autom4te.cache
should be removed.
comment:40 Changed 9 years ago by
I don't like using assert
for control flow, because that's not what it's meant for.
Why not replace those by (see #13210)
if rc != 0: print "Error: foo" sys.exit(rc)
comment:41 Changed 9 years ago by
There is something wrong with the history in SPKG.txt
(atlas-3.8.4 is completely missing and there is atlas-3.9.68 for #12011 which never got merged)
comment:42 follow-up: ↓ 44 Changed 9 years ago by
I don't have any strong opinion on where to put the lapack tarball, except that our convention of only allowing a single src/
directory is shortsighted.
Note that I'm not using assertions for control flow, i.e. I'm not using
try: <command> except AssertionError: <alternative>
Note that you could theoretically also catch the SystemExit
exception, so sys.exit()
isn't different from assert
in that regard. I'm only using assertions to ensure the following contract holds: spkg-install
completes successfully only if the relevant atlas configure/make completed with rc==0
I'll replace the asserts by something that returns rc as exit code, though.
comment:43 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:44 in reply to: ↑ 42 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to vbraun:
I'm only using assertions to ensure the following contract holds:
spkg-install
completes successfully only if the relevant atlas configure/make completed withrc==0
I think (IMHO but I might be wrong) that assertions should be used only in a situation where an assertion being false indicates a bug in the program. If rc != 0
in spkg-install
, that is an ordinary error condition, not a bug in the spkg-install
script.
comment:45 follow-up: ↓ 46 Changed 9 years ago by
Starting from sage-5.1, I get one doctest failure:
File "/release/merger/sage-5.1-atlas/devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx", line 1039: sage: parent(poly)([ 0.0 if abs(c)<=1e-14 else c for c in poly.coeffs() ]) Expected: 1.0 Got: 1.02140518266e-14*x^2 + 1.0
comment:46 in reply to: ↑ 45 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to jdemeyer:
Starting from sage-5.1, I get one doctest failure:
sage: parent(poly)([ 0.0 if abs(c)<=1e-14 else c for c in poly.coeffs() ])
it's most probably not at Atlas problem, but rather that 1e-14 (any solid rationale behind this choice? I guess not.) needs to be adjusted.
comment:47 Changed 9 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Benjamin Jones
Testing in sage-5.1.rc1 on x86_64 debian Linux:
$ uname -a Linux sage 2.6.32 #1 SMP Fri Sep 2 21:08:57 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ head -18 /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 44 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5690 @ 3.47GHz stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 3465.790 cache size : 12288 KB fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 11 wp : yes flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc rep_good aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm ida arat bogomips : 6931.58 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:
BEFORE new ATLAS spkg
sage -t "devel/sage-main/sage/modular/modsym/ambient.py" [11.6 s] sage -t "devel/sage-main/sage/modular/hecke/ambient_module.py" [4.2 s] sage -t "devel/sage-main/sage/modular/hecke/hecke_operator.py" [3.0 s]
AFTER new spkg
- untar'd fresh sage-5.1.rc1
- replaced atlas-3.8.4.p1.spkg with atlas-3.9.85.spkg
- make build
SPKG build log: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/bjones/atlas-3.9.85.log
Build atlas-3.9.85
real 11m18.595s user 11m15.906s sys 2m56.099s Successfully installed atlas-3.9.85
Tests
sage -t "devel/sage-main/sage/modular/modsym/ambient.py" [11.6 s] sage -t "devel/sage-main/sage/modular/hecke/ambient_module.py" [4.2 s] sage -t "devel/sage-main/sage/modular/hecke/hecke_operator.py" [3.1 s]
All tests
$ make ptestlong ... All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 1282.1 seconds
comment:48 Changed 9 years ago by
3.10.0 has just been released a few hours ago. Do we try to go for it? Like Jeroen remarked there may be tolerance issues depending on the hardware. I know I have one when using openblas instead of ATLAS.
comment:49 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
- Summary changed from Update ATLAS to version 3.9.x to Update ATLAS to stable version 3.10
comment:50 follow-up: ↓ 51 Changed 9 years ago by
The new spkg will attempt to build on OSX if SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH
is set. Untested, but a start.
I also am planning to allow SAGE_ATLAS_LIB=system
and use ldconfig -p
to get the system atlas, if available. Though perhaps we should do that in a later version. This spkg seems to fix some build issues that people reported on the sage mailinglists so it might be good to get it in sooner rather than later.
comment:51 in reply to: ↑ 50 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to vbraun:
so it might be good to get it in sooner rather than later.
+1, let's not worry now about changing the working of SAGE_ATLAS_LIB
.
comment:52 Changed 9 years ago by
- Dependencies set to sage-5.2.beta0
comment:53 Changed 9 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
Note that you cannot just use
sage -f atlas-3.9.32.spkg
to update atlas only. Many other spkgs use blas/lapack and must be rebuilt. The easiest way is to do a separate Sage installation...The cvxopt spkg needs to be updated to link correctly with this atlas release, see #10509.