Opened 10 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#10232 closed defect (fixed)
check GLPK bound errors
Reported by:  malb  Owned by:  jason, jkantor 

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage7.2 
Component:  numerical  Keywords:  
Cc:  mkoeppe, dimpase  Merged in:  
Authors:  Vincent Delecroix  Reviewers:  Dima Pasechnik 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  6503bc5 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  6503bc59718863887e5cc1a66c594be79912c071 
Dependencies:  #19525  Stopgaps: 
Description (last modified by )
This should never happen:
sage: from sage.numerical.backends.generic_backend import get_solver sage: p = get_solver(solver = "GLPK") sage: p.add_variable() 1 sage: p.variable_upper_bound(1) sig_error() without sig_on() ...  Unhandled SIGABRT: An abort() occurred. This probably occurred because a *compiled* module has a bug in it and is not properly wrapped with sig_on(), sig_off(). Python will now terminate.  Aborted
Change History (17)
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage5.11 to sage5.12
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.1 to sage6.2
comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.2 to sage6.3
comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage6.3 to sage6.4
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by
comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by
 Dependencies set to #19525
 Description modified (diff)
 Milestone changed from sage6.4 to sage7.2
comment:7 Changed 5 years ago by
 Branch set to u/vdelecroix/10232
 Commit set to 6503bc59718863887e5cc1a66c594be79912c071
 Status changed from new to needs_review
New commits:
6503bc5  Trac 10232: catch some errors in GLPK backend

comment:8 Changed 5 years ago by
 Cc mkoeppe added; ncohen removed
comment:9 Changed 5 years ago by
 Cc dimpase added
comment:10 Changed 5 years ago by
I think the title of this ticket needs to be changed to be more specific.
comment:11 Changed 5 years ago by
 Summary changed from MIP backends should perform bounds checks to check GLPK bound errors
comment:12 followup: ↓ 13 Changed 5 years ago by
 Summary changed from check GLPK bound errors to MIP backends should perform bounds checks
I've never seen <double?>
syntax. What does it do?
comment:13 in reply to: ↑ 12 Changed 5 years ago by
Replying to dimpase:
I've never seen
<double?>
syntax. What does it do?
It is a Cython cast with type checking: see the documentation.
comment:15 Changed 5 years ago by
 Reviewers set to Dima Pasechnik
comment:16 Changed 5 years ago by
 Summary changed from MIP backends should perform bounds checks to check GLPK bound errors
comment:17 Changed 5 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/vdelecroix/10232 to 6503bc59718863887e5cc1a66c594be79912c071
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
The method name changed
But still (with #19525 applied)