#10097 closed defect (fixed)
Sage won't start after moving or renaming the 4.6.alpha3 root directory
Reported by: | mpatel | Owned by: | jason, was |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | sage-4.6 |
Component: | notebook | Keywords: | |
Cc: | jason, kcrisman, timdumol | Merged in: | sage-4.6.alpha3 |
Authors: | Jason Grout, Mitesh Patel | Reviewers: | Jason Grout |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
This is a follow-up to #9920. The package extraction patch at that ticket makes an absolute link
ln -sf "$SAGE_ROOT/devel/sagenb-main" "$SAGE_ROOT/devel/sagenb"
that should be relative. Also, it seems we need to rerun python setup.py develop
in SAGE_LOCAL/bin/sage-location
.
Attachments (1)
Change History (21)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by
Both good points. sage-location is seriously broken right now anyway. #9210 goes a long ways towards fixing sage-location, but is mired in some reports of it not working (and some reports of it working).
Shouldn't the setup.py develop create relative references to the sagenb repository, rather than absolute references? That would take care of the second point.
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by
Okay, it looks like the absolute reference in setup.py develop is in $SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/easy-install.pth: /Users/grout/sage-4.6/devel/sagenb-main
-- that should be a relative reference like the rest of the paths in the .pth file are.
The other absolute reference is the $SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sagenb.egg-link file: /Users/grout/sage-4.6/devel/sagenb-main
, which should also be a relative reference.
It looks like we can set this path when we do setup.py develop:
sage -python setup.py develop --egg-path ../../../../devel/sagenb-main
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to jason:
Shouldn't the setup.py develop create relative references to the sagenb repository, rather than absolute references? That would take care of the second point.
For the "topmost" link, we could use
cd "$SAGE_ROOT/devel" ln -snf sagenb-main sagenb
in SageNB's spkg-install
.
For example, sage-build
does
if [ "$1" != "" ]; then # make devel/sage point to devel/$1 cd "$SAGE_ROOT/devel/" if [ ! -d "sage-$1" ]; then # this will happen a lot because of people (=me) making typos. echo "No such branch '$SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-$1'" echo "Use 'sage -clone' to create a new branch." exit 1 fi ln -snf "sage-$1" sage fi
comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by
So we have solutions for everything except the easy-install.pth file. I can't figure out how to get setuptools to change that path to a relative path. I suppose we could just search/replace that one path after doing setup.py develop.
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by
Sorry, to set the .egg-link file to have a relative path, we need to:
cd $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sagenb sage -python setup.py develop --egg-path ../../../../devel/sagenb
comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by
I've posted a question to stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3886667/how-to-get-setuptools-to-use-a-relative-path-in-easy-install-pth-when-doing-setu
Also, the solution might be in using the virtualenv feature of setuptools. There is a --relocatable option that might make things in Sage easier.
comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by
See http://pypi.python.org/pypi/virtualenv for the virtualenv (search for "Making Environments Relocatable")
comment:9 follow-up: ↓ 10 Changed 11 years ago by
What if we do
cd SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/python/site-packages echo ../../../../devel/sagenb > sagenb.pth
? Does this effectively override the path in easy-install.pth
?
comment:10 in reply to: ↑ 9 Changed 11 years ago by
Replying to mpatel:
What if we do
cd SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/python/site-packages echo ../../../../devel/sagenb > sagenb.pth? Does this effectively override the path in
easy-install.pth
?
No. There is one easy-install.pth file, and that's it. I think we need to change the absolute pathname in it to be a relative path name (which should be a simple search/replace or sed command)
comment:11 follow-up: ↓ 13 Changed 11 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
I've attached a patch, which is part of
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mpatel/trac/10097/sagenb-0.8.7.spkg
(I haven't used sed's -i
option, because it does not work on Solaris.)
comment:12 Changed 11 years ago by
- Cc kcrisman added
comment:13 in reply to: ↑ 11 Changed 11 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Replying to mpatel:
I've attached a patch, which is part of
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mpatel/trac/10097/sagenb-0.8.7.spkg
(I haven't used sed's
-i
option, because it does not work on Solaris.)
The effect looks good and spkg looks good. Positive review.
comment:14 Changed 11 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Jason Grout
comment:15 Changed 11 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-4.6.alpha3
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
comment:16 follow-ups: ↓ 17 ↓ 18 Changed 10 years ago by
Florent Hivert has reported on sage-release a problem starting Sage 4.6.rc0 built from scratch on openSUSE 11.3. Apparently, "sagenb" does not appear in easy-install.pth
during the build, so the patch above does not insert the relative path we want.
comment:17 in reply to: ↑ 16 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to mpatel:
Florent Hivert has reported on sage-release a problem starting Sage 4.6.rc0 built from scratch on openSUSE 11.3. Apparently, "sagenb" does not appear in
easy-install.pth
during the build, so the patch above does not insert the relative path we want.
See Leif Leonhardy's replies for some suggestions.
comment:18 in reply to: ↑ 16 ; follow-ups: ↓ 19 ↓ 20 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to mpatel:
Florent Hivert has reported on sage-release a problem starting Sage 4.6.rc0 built from scratch on openSUSE 11.3. Apparently, "sagenb" does not appear in
easy-install.pth
during the build, so the patch above does not insert the relative path we want.
I've opened #10176 for this problem.
comment:19 in reply to: ↑ 18 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to mpatel:
Replying to mpatel:
Florent Hivert has reported on sage-release a problem starting Sage 4.6.rc0 built from scratch on openSUSE 11.3. Apparently, "sagenb" does not appear in
easy-install.pth
during the build, so the patch above does not insert the relative path we want.I've opened #10176 for this problem.
I've uploaded a follow-up spkg patch (currently just for testing / debugging) at #10176, no idea if that fixes the problem. (Others can of course test it on other platforms to make sure it doesn't break anything. Works for me on Ubuntu 10.04.)
Florent reported he had the same failure on OpenSuSE 11.1, too, so it might be specific to his installations, since Sage 4.6.rc0 was said to work on Skynet's menas (which runs OpenSuSE 11.1, too), but perhaps just by good luck...
comment:20 in reply to: ↑ 18 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to mpatel:
Replying to mpatel:
Florent Hivert has reported on sage-release a problem starting Sage 4.6.rc0 built from scratch on openSUSE 11.3. Apparently, "sagenb" does not appear in
easy-install.pth
during the build, so the patch above does not insert the relative path we want.I've opened #10176 for this problem.
#10192 (currently needing review) also solves this, but in a different way (by patching sage-spkg
to get rid of ".
" in PYTHONPATH
before installing an spkg).
Can we fix this within a day? I'd really like to release 4.6.alpha3 with this fixed. The current trial 4.6.alpha3, which is otherwise ready to go, is at