Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#10038 new enhancement
Wrap Maxima's demoivre and exponentialize
Reported by: | mpatel | Owned by: | burcin |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-6.4 |
Component: | symbolics | Keywords: | |
Cc: | kcrisman, fmaltey | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
Sage does not appear to have easily accesible analogues of Mathematica's TrigToExp
and ExpToTrig
. From AskSage:
sage: x = var('x') sage: t1 = cos(x) sage: t2 = e^(I * x) / 2 / I - e^(-I * x) / 2 / I sage: sageobj(t1._maxima_().exponentialize()) 1/2*e^(-I*x) + 1/2*e^(I*x) sage: sageobj(t2._maxima_().demoivre()) sin(x)
Change History (6)
comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 2 Changed 11 years ago by
- Cc fmaltey added
comment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 11 years ago by
- Milestone set to sage-4.6.1
Replying to burcin:
You can use
maxima_methods()
to access the maxima functions easily.
Yes, thanks for that reminder!
I am very much against wrapping each maxima function for manipulating symbolic expressions individually from Sage. Even though maxima provides a lot of functionality, their user interface is far from intuitive.
I don't see why we can't provide a more intuitive user interface for some of them, though. Just because a ticket is opened doesn't mean it will ever be fulfilled, but at least it's here now if enough people want it.
IMHO, the user interface to these functions should be something like:
sage: t1.rewrite(exp) 1/2*e^(-I*x) + 1/2*e^(I*x) sage: t2.rewrite(sin) sin(x)
This seems awkward, esp. if you don't know ahead of time whether it's sin or cos. I think that simplify_*
makes sense, the way we have it now. For now it's not worth having the discussion - I doubt anyone has time to do this right now. But if someone does, maybe it's time to revisit that.
BTW, it would be great if we could think about how to provide basic functionality like this directly in Sage without relying on
Yes, of course. If only we could have that Sage Days solely about symbolics...
- http://www.ginac.de/tutorial/Applying-a-function-on-subexpressions.html and
- http://www.ginac.de/tutorial/Visitors-and-tree-traversal.html
but it's well worth the effort.
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12
comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.1 to sage-6.2
comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3
comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4
You can use
maxima_methods()
to access the maxima functions easily.I am very much against wrapping each maxima function for manipulating symbolic expressions individually from Sage. Even though maxima provides a lot of functionality, their user interface is far from intuitive.
IMHO, the user interface to these functions should be something like:
BTW, it would be great if we could think about how to provide basic functionality like this directly in Sage without relying on maxima. It's possible that this requires wrapping more of pynac's features, for example
but it's well worth the effort.