SageNB 0.8.6

[mpatel]

Merged in SageNB 0.8.3: #9000, #9148, #9327, #9822.

Merged in SageNB 0.8.4: #9920.

Merged in SageNB 0.8.5: #9828.

Merged in SageNB 0.8.6: #9920 (devel/ fix).

Release manager

Please merge

• ​http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mpatel/trac/10036/sagenb-0.8.6.spkg
• sage repository patch at #9920: ​http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/9920/trac_9920-sagelib-hg.patch
• sage and scripts repository patches at #9828:

More specifically:

• install ​http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mpatel/trac/10036/sagenb-0.8.6.spkg
• install the new Cython spkg at #9828: ​http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/robertwb/cython/cython-0.13.p1.spkg
• apply the Cython patch at #9828 to the Sage repository: ​http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/9828/trac_9828-cython_0_13.patch
• apply the Cython patch at #9828 to the Sage scripts repository: ​http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/9828/trac_9828-scripts_hudson.patch
• apply the hg_sage patch at #9920 to the Sage repository: ​http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/9920/trac_9920-sagelib-hg.patch

Then do sage -ba to refresh the Cython files.

[mpatel]

The long doctests pass for me with 4.6.alpha2 + SageNB 0.8.3 on sage.math.

My current local setup is limited, so I don't know about the Selenium tests. As far as I'm aware, we still need to update the SageNB Se tests for the latest released version of Selenium RC.

[jason]

It would be really great if #9920 were slipped into this as well.

What do we need to do to review this? We already reviewed the individual patches.

[mpatel]

Replying to jason:

What do we need to do to review this? We already reviewed the individual patches.

I think you can just check that I didn't make a mistake in applying the right tickets, install the package, run the doctests.

[mpatel]

A tentative SageNB 0.8.5 == 0.8.4 + #9828 is at

​http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mpatel/trac/10036/sagenb-0.8.5.spkg

[mpatel]

Could someone please review the package?

[mpatel]

There's an error building Sage from scratch. See #9920 for the problem.

[mpatel]

Replying to mpatel:

There's an error building Sage from scratch. See #9920 for the problem.

Fixed in 0.8.6, which needs a [formal] review for 4.6.alpha3.

[jason]

I'm a little confused at what to do to test this. I've updated the description. Did I get everything?

[vbraun]

In #10094 I'm switching on c++ support in cython-0.13, this changes (actually, fixes) one sage.misc.sageinspect.py doctest. The analogous change needs to be made to sagenb.misc.sageinspect.py when/if that patch is accepted. Its simple: ​http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/10094/trac_10094_fix_doctests.patch

[jason]

Okay, I followed the steps in the description (using 4.6.alpha2), on a production server running behind an apache proxy. ptestlong passed all tests, and I was successfully able to log in, run worksheets, create accounts, etc. So positive review.

[jason]

Replying to vbraun:

In #10094 I'm switching on c++ support in cython-0.13, this changes (actually, fixes) one sage.misc.sageinspect.py doctest. The analogous change needs to be made to sagenb.misc.sageinspect.py when/if that patch is accepted. Its simple: ​http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/10094/trac_10094_fix_doctests.patch

This change has already been made in one of the patches merged into 0.8.6, so nothing needs to be done.

[mpatel]

Thanks, Jason!

[mpatel]

I'm merging #10097's 0.8.7 package, which supersedes 0.8.6.