Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 3 months ago
#2827 new defect
sage -notebook does not handle options passed to it correctly
Reported by: | mhansen | Owned by: | boothby |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-6.3 |
Component: | notebook | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by mabshoff)
The suspect code is the following (which isn't flexible enough):
if len(sys.argv) > 1: notebook(*sys.argv[1:])
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by mabshoff
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 follow-up: ↓ 4 Changed 6 years ago by was
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by mabshoff
Some recent work went in in this area? Can someone still reproduce this or is this ticket invalid?
Cheers,
Michael
comment:4 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed 5 years ago by timdumol
- Report Upstream set to N/A
Replying to was:
Maybe we should change sage -notebook so that it works like this:
sage -notebook "(secure=True, address='sage.math.washington.edu', accounts=False)"where anything in quotes is valid Python. What do you think?
This seems quite reasonable to me. I also remember Dr. Kirkby's problem with specifying server_pool using sage -n.
comment:5 Changed 12 months ago by jdemeyer
- Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12
comment:6 Changed 6 months ago by vbraun_spam
- Milestone changed from sage-6.1 to sage-6.2
comment:7 Changed 3 months ago by vbraun_spam
- Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Maybe we should change sage -notebook so that it works like this:
where anything in quotes is valid Python. What do you think?