Ticket #8969 (closed defect: fixed)
problems with maxima inequalities
| Reported by: | dsm | Owned by: | burcin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-5.1 |
| Component: | symbolics | Keywords: | sd40.5 |
| Cc: | Work issues: | ||
| Report Upstream: | N/A | Reviewers: | Karl-Dieter Crisman |
| Authors: | Douglas McNeil | Merged in: | sage-5.1.beta5 |
| Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by dsm) (diff)
'Sage Version 4.4.1, Release Date: 2010-05-02'
mac 10.4 32 bit running on 10.5.8.
sage: solve([2*x==3, x < 10], x) [[x == (3/2)]] sage: solve([2*x==3, x > 10], x) [] sage: solve([2*x==3, x == 10], x) [] sage: solve([2*x==3, x == 3/2], x) [[x == (3/2)]] sage: solve([2*x==3, x < 4, x > 4], x) []
all work as expected, but:
sage: solve([2*x==3, x != 5], x)
-----------------------------------------------------------
!TypeError Traceback (most recent call last)
/Applications/sage/devel/sage-main/build/sage/<ipython console> in <module>()
/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/symbolic/relation.pyc in solve(f, *args, **kwds)
670 s = []
671
--> 672 sol_list = string_to_list_of_solutions(repr(s))
673 if 'solution_dict' in kwds and kwds!['solution_dict']==True:
674 if isinstance(sol_list![0], list):
]/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/symbolic/relation.pyc in string_to_list_of_solutions(s)
455 from sage.structure.sequence import Sequence
456 from sage.calculus.calculus import symbolic_expression_from_maxima_string
--> 457 v = symbolic_expression_from_maxima_string(s, equals_sub=True)
458 return Sequence(v, universe=Objects(), cr_str=True)
459
/Applications/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/calculus/calculus.py in symbolic_expression_from_maxima_string(x, equals_sub, maxima)
1527 return symbolic_expression_from_string(s, syms, accept_sequence=True)
1528 except !!!!SyntaxError:
-> 1529 raise !TypeError, "unable to make sense of Maxima expression '%s' in Sage"%s
1530 finally:
1531 is_simplified = False
!TypeError: unable to make sense of Maxima expression '[[x==3/2,-7/2!==0]]' in Sage
--
The !== which is causing trouble is due to the
if equals_sub:
s = s.replace('=','==')
lines in symbolic_expression_from_maxima_string. This could be fixed by changing the replace to a regexp, or adding a hack s = s.replace('!==', '!=') afterwards.
Attachments
Change History
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by kcrisman
- Description modified (diff)
DSM, is this really all one ticket? It's kind of confusing.
comment:3 Changed 12 months ago by dsm
- Keywords sd40.5 added
- Status changed from new to needs_review
- Description modified (diff)
- Authors set to Douglas McNeil
comment:4 Changed 12 months ago by dsm
It was all one ticket in my head, but maybe it makes more sense to separate them. Might as well address the low-hanging fruit.
comment:5 Changed 12 months ago by kcrisman
The problem wasn't really our translation of Maxima's inequality (#, which we finally fixed a while ago) but rather that we then had this little hack already.
But all of your tests already work in Sage 5.0, because of the # replacement. It really has to test the original bug report example, otherwise this is trivial. I suggest
sage: from sage.calculus.calculus import symbolic_expression_from_maxima_string as sefms
sage: sefms("x != 3") == SR(x != 3)
True
sage: sefms("x # 3") == SR(x != 3)
True
sage: solve([2*x==3, x != 5], x)
[[x == (3/2), (-7/2) != 0]]
comment:6 Changed 12 months ago by dsm
Oy, you're right that I truncated the original bug test (!). But we do need to fix !== to round-trip neq, so I think it's worth doing.
Changed 12 months ago by dsm
-
attachment
trac_8969_allow_neq_maxima_strings_v2.patch
added
revised version
