Ticket #8740 (needs_review enhancement)
Upgrade sqlalchemy to 0.7.6
| Reported by: | timdumol | Owned by: | tbd |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.10 |
| Component: | packages: standard | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | tdumol, fbissey | Work issues: | SPKG.txt |
| Report Upstream: | N/A | Reviewers: | François Bissey |
| Authors: | Mike Hansen, Tim Dumol | Merged in: | |
| Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by mhansen) (diff)
The latest version of SQLAlchemy is now 0.7.6. This brings a bunch of changes, notably a native unicode mode, which would be a lot faster for unicode rich applications, such as the Sage Notebook.
The new package is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sqlalchemy-0.7.6.spkg
Change History
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by timdumol
- Status changed from new to needs_review
- Description modified (diff)
- Authors set to Tim Dumol
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by mhansen
- Cc tdumol added
- Description modified (diff)
- Authors changed from Tim Dumol to Mike Hansen
comment:5 follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed 2 years ago by timdumol
Actually, sqlalchemy now has a release http://www.sqlalchemy.org/download.html|0.7, and since nothing in Sage currently uses it (at least, in the standard packages), it may be best to upgrade to 0.7. What do you think?
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 5 Changed 2 years ago by fbissey
Replying to timdumol:
Actually, sqlalchemy now has a release http://www.sqlalchemy.org/download.html|0.7, and since nothing in Sage currently uses it (at least, in the standard packages), it may be best to upgrade to 0.7. What do you think?
No objections, I seem to be in a reviewing mood. If you post it, I'll test it on a couple of systems.
comment:7 Changed 2 years ago by timdumol
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
- Description modified (diff)
- Summary changed from Upgrade sqlalchemy to 0.6.0 to Upgrade sqlalchemy to 0.7.0
Alright. Package made, but it's taking a bit of time to upload to server.
comment:8 Changed 2 years ago by timdumol
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
- Description modified (diff)
- Authors changed from Mike Hansen to Mike Hansen, Tim Dumol
comment:9 Changed 2 years ago by fbissey
everything is ok on x86 and amd64. I am testing this on OSX and then I'll give it a positive review.
comment:10 Changed 2 years ago by fbissey
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
- Reviewers set to François Bissey
Fine on OS X. No doctests to run or break and there is currently no SPKG check but that should be another ticket provided that sqlalchemy has some self-tests. Positive review from me.
comment:11 Changed 2 years ago by jdemeyer
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
- Work issues set to SPKG.txt
SPKG.txt should mention version number 0.7.0 instead of 0.7. It would also be good to mention the ticket number in SPKG.txt
comment:12 Changed 2 years ago by jdemeyer
Note that in the mean time, SQLAlchemy 0.7.1 was released ( http://www.sqlalchemy.org/download.html), maybe you might as well use that version?
comment:13 Changed 2 years ago by jdemeyer
*ping*
comment:14 Changed 2 years ago by fbissey
Sorry Jeroen, I have been busy with a couple of earthquakes and I was hoping Tim would make the new spkg.
comment:15 Changed 14 months ago by mhansen
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
- Description modified (diff)
I've updated the spkg to 0.7.6.
comment:16 Changed 12 months ago by mhansen
- Summary changed from Upgrade sqlalchemy to 0.7.0 to Upgrade sqlalchemy to 0.7.6
