Ticket #12623 (closed defect: worksforme)
PIL package doesn't know about debian multiarch
| Reported by: | Snark | Owned by: | tbd |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
| Component: | packages: standard | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Work issues: | ||
| Report Upstream: | N/A | Reviewers: | Julien Puydt |
| Authors: | Merged in: | ||
| Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
I found that the PIL spkg has patches to deal with lib vs lib64 ; unfortunately, debian-based distributions have (or will soon have) another way to handle having various types of libraries on the same system.
I'm going to propose a patch which will add support for multiarch, based on the patch which is already used in debian for the python-imaging version 1.17. It is a very clean patch, as it only triggers on debian-based systems which have already made the switch.
Attachments
Change History
Changed 15 months ago by Snark
-
attachment
trac-12623.patch
added
comment:5 Changed 10 months ago by jdemeyer
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_info
Why is this patch needed? I don't have any problems building PIL on multi-arch systems.
comment:6 Changed 9 months ago by Snark
I had a compilation issue while compiling the spkg in experimental settings ; as debian already packages this, I don't care anymore about the spkg being solid ; please close (why can't I close a ticket I opened?)
comment:7 Changed 9 months ago by jdemeyer
- Milestone changed from sage-5.3 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
comment:9 Changed 9 months ago by jdemeyer
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
- Reviewers set to Julien Puydt
- Authors Julien Puydt deleted
comment:10 Changed 9 months ago by jdemeyer
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
- Resolution set to worksforme

The promised patch for multiarch support