Ticket #10444 (closed enhancement: fixed)
Make solve documentation better
| Reported by: | kcrisman | Owned by: | mvngu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-5.3 |
| Component: | documentation | Keywords: | symbolic sd31 |
| Cc: | jason, burcin, dsm, benjaminfjones | Work issues: | |
| Report Upstream: | N/A | Reviewers: | Benjamin Jones |
| Authors: | Karl-Dieter Crisman | Merged in: | sage-5.3.beta0 |
| Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by benjaminfjones) (diff)
To be precise, make sure the documentation at
sage: x.solve?
is available from
sage: solve?
There are a lot of keywords people are missing out on.
Apply to Sage library:
Attachments
Change History
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by kcrisman
- Cc jason, burcin added
- Status changed from new to needs_review
- Milestone set to sage-4.7.1
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by travis
When applying the patch to my version 4.7, I received the error:
applying /home/travis/.sage/temp/euler.math.mc/4600/tmp_0.patch patching file sage/symbolic/expression.pyx Hunk #1 succeeded at 7365 with fuzz 2 (offset -44 lines). patching file sage/symbolic/relation.py Hunk #1 FAILED at 478 Hunk #3 succeeded at 625 with fuzz 2 (offset 2 lines). 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file sage/symbolic/relation.py.rej abort: patch failed to apply Also, what was left over had some odd spacing issues when checking x.solve?
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by kcrisman
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
- Work issues set to fix whitespace issues
This patch is based on 4.7.1.alpha2.
However, I see in the patch preview that for some reason there is extra whitespace, so I'll have to take care of that sometime. For now, needs work for that reason.
comment:5 Changed 10 months ago by kcrisman
Wow, I guess we let time forget this. Surprisingly, it still applies in the important place, and the stuff that doesn't apply is no longer needed.
Updated patch coming up.
comment:6 Changed 10 months ago by kcrisman
- Cc dsm, benjaminfjones added
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
- Authors set to Karl-Dieter Crisman
Okay, this really needs to get in. Hopefully a quite easy review.
Changed 10 months ago by benjaminfjones
-
attachment
trac_10444_reviewer.patch
added
very small reviewer patch
comment:7 Changed 10 months ago by benjaminfjones
Looks really good. Thanks for taking care of this. I spotted two very small typos, a reviewer patch is attached. I'll set to positive review once I've checked out the html documentation, but everything looks good from the terminal!
comment:8 Changed 10 months ago by benjaminfjones
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
- Reviewers set to Benjamin Jones
- Work issues fix whitespace issues deleted
OK, lookin' good. Positive review.
comment:10 Changed 10 months ago by jdemeyer
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
- Resolution set to fixed
- Merged in set to sage-5.3.beta0

This patch at least begins to fix this issue. It just copies the most obvious examples. But I think it will help a lot.
Improvements welcome! Otherwise, please review.